std.linalg
SomeDude
lovelydear at mailmetrash.com
Fri Oct 11 22:20:04 PDT 2013
On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 16:10:21 UTC, FreeSlave wrote:
> There is "Matrices and linear algebra" module in wish list.
> Let's discuss its design. D is complicated language so it's
> difficult to choose the right way here. We need to find
> compromise between efficiency and convenient interface. I'm
> going to make some suggestions how this module should look like.
>
>
> Please, make your suggestions too.
Firstly, my opinion is, it shouldn't be in the std package.
Secondly, if it's not super highly performant, noone will use it.
The highest performing linalg libraries implement the low level
BLAS API or are vendor specific, like the Intel MKL. These are
super optimized libraries where the asm code is hand optimized by
specialists (GotoBLAS and the derived OpenBLAS for instance), and
these will be *very* hard to beat. So much so that if BLAS isn't
used as the engine, it's very unlikely that your library will be
used for serious number crunching.
Built above BLAS, you can find a number of libraries that make
using linear algebra more pleasant. One such library, currently
the best IMHO is Armadillo C++. It has the very big advantage
that it mimics Matlab functions. This feature is extremely
useful, because scientists very often model their algorithms in
Matlab before porting them to C++. This is what is done in the
company I work for.
So the best I could suggest is to study the Armadillo C++ library
and port it to D.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list