Qt bindings for D
Abdulhaq
alynch4047 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 14 02:45:17 PDT 2013
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 09:03:44 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
> On Sunday, 13 October 2013 at 21:28:20 UTC, David Nadlinger
>>
>> Okay, so what do you guys think about starting an
>> "unofficial-official" (I can't speak for Eldar and Max, the
>> main authors of QtD, but you have my blessing as a contributor
>> of the project) QtD revival repository on GitHub to coordinate
>> the efforts?
>>
>> I can set you up with access to github.com/qtd if you want.
>>
>> David
>
> I recommend to dump it and start from scratch. A clang-based
> generator would be an interesting option to explore. Or, if you
> want to preserve your sanity, just write Qt applications in
> C++/QML.
Hi Max, so why dump it? I can see a few reasons why you might
propose that:
1) You think it's a dead end because QtJambi is dead, so it would
be problematic to move it forward with new versions of Qt
2) There are some problems with the architecture of the binding
that you're aware of that would prevent it from working reliably
For (1), I think even only having 4.8 is still a real asset. I
don't know the code base really well (but spent a fair amount of
time with it, and know the PyQt technology fairly well too) so
can't speak to (2) but if you had specific concerns it would be
very interesting to know what they were.
From my testing it seems to me that a lot is working, enough to
write useful GUIs in it - tell me what I'm missing (a lot, I
know, but is anything really fatally flawed)?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list