Early review of std.logger

[Sönke Ludwig]

Am 15.10.2013 09:08, schrieb Jacob Carlborg:
> On 2013-10-14 23:22, Dicebot wrote:
>
>> If we need to care about that, D module system is a failure.
>> But I don't think it is a valid concern.
>
> People already complain about conflict function names in Phobos.
>

And I'd agree with them. At least inside of a library, care IMO should 
be taken to minimize overlap (of course functionally equivalent ones in 
different overload sets are fine, though). But in case of "logXXX" this 
seems to be very unlikely, much in contrast to "log" (std.math.log).