Eloquently sums up my feelings about the disadvantages of dynamic typing
simendsjo
simendsjo at gmail.com
Wed Oct 16 03:52:46 PDT 2013
On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 10:37:28 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> On 10/16/2013 08:46 AM, simendsjo wrote:
>>
>> No.. Give me a language that catches obvious bugs at
>> compile-time, makes
>> code self-documenting and doesn't let me worry about
>> performance.
>> ...
>
> Why just obvious bugs?
Hehe. Sure - let the compiler catch *all* my bugs!
scope, const, immutable, pure, nothrow, safe, ... D makes it
harder to shoot yourself in the foot, but you are aiming at your
foot by default..
Too bad I have to add a lot of annotations
void f(Class i) {}
to
void f(in Class i) const pure nothrow @safe {}
I would rather have to write
void f(@(mutable, escapes) Class i) @(impure mutable throws
unsafe) {}
If @mutable and @impure existed, I could just add some
annotations at the top of each module, but it wouldn't help on
parameters.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list