std.allocator ready for some abuse

[Meta]

On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 23:22:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> The first thing I notice is that this module is dead unsafe. 
> I'm not sure it belong to std. We should probably reserve that 
> for a "guru" part of the standard lib. Putting some system 
> function in the standard lib is OK, as they are packaged around 
> concepts (range, array, algorithms, etc . . .) but an entire 
> module dedicated to @system stuff seems like it belong to 
> another place.

std.unsafe.*?