C to D bindings: how much do you D-ify the code?

[Dicebot]

On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 16:22:46 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> As an aside, I would suggest that function overloads that take 
> arrays instead of pointer + length is normally a harmless 
> addition to an otherwise 1:1 set of bindings.

I disagree. You can always add those wrappers in stage-2 module 
and get it inlined so there is no profit in doing it in stage-1 
module. But losing ability to auto-generate stuff is huge.