Everyone who writes safety critical software should read this
Chris
wendlec at tcd.ie
Wed Oct 30 11:49:28 PDT 2013
On Wednesday, 30 October 2013 at 18:35:44 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:12 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> […]
>> Much effort in cockpit design goes into trying to figure out
>> what the pilot would do "intuitively" and ensuring that that
>> is the right thing to do.
>
> I've no experience with cockpit design, but I am aware of all
> the HCI
> work that went into air traffic control in the 1980s and 1990s,
> especially realizing the safety protocols which are
> socio-political
> systems as much as computer realized things. This sort of
> safety work is
> as much about the context and the human actors as much as the
> computer
> and software.
>
>> Of course, we try to do that with programming language design,
>> too, with varying degrees of success.
> […]
>
> Has any programming language ever had psychology of programming
> folk
> involved from the outset rather than after the fact as a "patch
> up"
> activity?
Ruby, they say. Even if it's only one programmer they based it
on. :-)
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list