std.serialization: pre-voting review / discussion
ilya-stromberg
ilya-stromberg-2009 at yandex.ru
Wed Sep 4 05:37:51 PDT 2013
On Wednesday, 14 August 2013 at 09:26:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
> On 2013-08-14 11:17, Tove wrote:
>> I find the newstyle both more intuitive and you also more dry
>> not
>> duplicating the identifier: "int b; mixin NonSerialized!(b)"
>>
>> @nonSerialized struct Foo
>> {
>> int a;
>> int b;
>> int c;
>> }
>>
>> struct Bar
>> {
>> int a;
>> int b;
>> @nonSerialized int c;
>> }
>
> Absolutely.
Jacob, can you add "@serializationName(string name)" UDA?
I saw the custom serialization example from documentation:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18386187/docs/std.serialization/std_serialization_serializable.html#.Serializable
class Foo : Serializable
{
int a;
void toData (Serializer serializer, Serializer.Data key)
{
serializer.serialize(a, "b");
}
void fromData (Serializer serializer, Serializer.Data key)
{
a = serializer.deserialize!(int)("b");
}
}
Whith "@serializationName(string name)" attribute example should
look like this:
class Foo
{
@serializationName("b")
int a;
}
Or for class/struct name:
@serializationName("Bar")
class Foo
{
int a;
}
I think it's easier to use than custom serialization. And
"@nonSerialized" UDA used for same purpose - simplify
serialization customization.
Is it possible to implement?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list