Add support implicit conversion between types

[deadalnix]

On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 13:31:41 UTC, ilya-stromberg wrote:
> On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 13:25:37 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
>> It's difficult to never forget the "explicit" keyword in c++, 
>> and this little mistake can make you loose a lot of time.
>>
>> I prefer to only have explicit conversions with cast or 
>> constructors calls, that all make the code easier to 
>> understand.
>
> Yes. I sugest keep current D bechavior by default, but add 
> "implicit" keyword.
> It allows to add implicit cast only if it SAFE.

You don't want a keyword for that. Something obscure and ugly is 
required.