new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates

[Simen Kjaeraas]

On 2013-09-08, 12:46, Tove wrote:

> Wouldn't this style be an acceptable compromise instead? with both  
> declaration and definition 100% identical.
>
> struct S
> {
>    // member function declarations
>    static int mfunc1(int a, int b = 5) pure;
>    static int mfunc2(int a, int b = 5) pure;
>    static int mfunc3(int a, int b = 5) pure;
>
>    // member function definitions
>    static int mfunc1(int a, int b = 5) pure
>    {
>    }
>    static int mfunc2(int a, int b = 5) pure
>    {
>    }
>    static int mfunc3(int a, int b = 5) pure
>    {
>    }
> }

The problem here is the compiler does not enforce that all
definitions are present in the declaration list. Apart from that, I
feel this is the correct solution to the problem.

-- 
   Simen