new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates

Mon Sep 9 05:57:48 PDT 2013

On Monday, 9 September 2013 at 04:18:29 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> For that second, it has been discussed in the thread to improve 
> the di behavior to fit that role. Do think this is a viable 
> approach, and that your team of happy devs would have benefited 
> from that ?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the problem of using 
manually-written .di files to separate out class declaration and 
definition, that you consequently also have to manually include 
all the declarations of all the other module content?