Had another 48hr game jam this weekend...

[Arjan]

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:15:12 +0200, Bruno Medeiros  
<brunodomedeiros+dng at gmail.com> wrote:

> That said, I do agree that Eclipse is generally slower than Visual  
> Studio. Eclipse (and most existing plugins) are almost entirely  
> Java-based, which has some JIT and GC overheards. Whereas VS is done in  
> C++ and C# (I'm guessing a lot of critical bits are developed in C++, at  
> least for VS2010).
> But I don't think Eclipse is as bad or as slow as a lot of people make  
> it appear to be. And better functionality would make up for it, for sure.

+1

It is slower, but IMO not unbearable slower.