D2 is really that stable as it is claimed to be?

[Peter Alexander]

On Saturday, 21 September 2013 at 17:41:38 UTC, Zhouxuan wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11086
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11010
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10970
>
> I've found and reported these bugs after about merely 100 LOCs 
> written down.
> Should I continue?
>
> Despite these tiny issues, I see a lot of people complain about 
> container, GC etc, but I can't found any offical reply, also no 
> roadmap at all.

D is not what I would call stable, but it is very usable. 
Apparently D is used at Facebook in some capacity, but Andrei 
won't tell us more than that :-)

Not long ago I would find bugs every hour or so, but now I rarely 
find bugs. Perhaps I have just learned to write code in the 
subset of D that works well, but the language is definitely a lot 
more stable.

Please continue to submit bugs. The D contributors do fix bugs 
very rapidly in general.