std.allocator needs your help

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Mon Sep 23 13:04:49 PDT 2013


On 9/23/2013 10:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> I'm unclear on what void[] means starting from its semantics.

I agree that it should be void[], as that represents (in D) a block of untyped 
data. void[] should be ideal for a primitive allocator.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list