std.allocator needs your help

[deadalnix]

On Monday, 23 September 2013 at 20:18:56 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 9/23/13 1:04 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> On 9/23/2013 10:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> I'm unclear on what void[] means starting from its semantics.
>>
>> I agree that it should be void[], as that represents (in D) a 
>> block of
>> untyped data. void[] should be ideal for a primitive allocator.
>
> Great, made that change, it all works. Does void[] make any 
> promise about alignment?
>
> Andrei

void[] dont make any promise about anything, that is the whole 
point.