D2 is really that stable as it is claimed to be?
Denis Shelomovskij
verylonglogin.reg at gmail.com
Wed Sep 25 05:43:40 PDT 2013
21.09.2013 21:41, Zhouxuan пишет:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11086
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11010
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10970
>
> I've found and reported these bugs after about merely 100 LOCs written
> down.
> Should I continue?
>
> Despite these tiny issues, I see a lot of people complain about
> container, GC etc, but I can't found any offical reply, also no roadmap
> at all.
A year or two ago it was a lot of wrong-code bugs with lambdas and
nested functions making e.g. `std.algorithm` almost unusable. But it's
only the beginning. OPTLINK bug causing random linking failures thus
making the whole language unusable for real projects was fixed only
about half a year ago.
And all this time I liked D except "the language is stable" words. And
when half a year ago D become fully usable I become happy. For me
"enough stability" is an ability to grab my copy of tool-chain and work
with it without random failures.
Since then I had not any real problems with breaking changes or
regressions. Generally regressions are fixed quickly and as for me the
more breaking changes the better language we get. )
--
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list