review queue: next?

[ilya-stromberg]

On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 09:14:59 UTC, Robert Schadek 
wrote:
> On 09/10/2013 03:45 PM, Dicebot wrote:
>>
>>> done and done (the design of my logger is based on what I 
>>> distilled from
>>> the old discussion)
>>
>> Thanks! You will be next after Brian then (pardon me for 
>> wanting
>> std.d.lexer so much :P)
> No problem, it might be good though to get so bashing 
> beforehand to make
> it review worthy.

It looks like we finished review of std.d.lexer.
Do you have any plans to start review for Robert Schadek's 
std.logger?