Recommendation: Compile DMD with More Warnings
Brad Roberts
braddr at puremagic.com
Mon Apr 7 13:02:28 PDT 2014
On 4/6/14, 10:38 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 4/6/2014 9:45 AM, Orvid King wrote:
>> If you want, I have the results of a static analysis of DMD that I could post,
>> as processed in 23 hours and 58 minutes by Intel's C compiler, using 10gb of RAM
>> the entire time. If I can figure out how to have it not skip any methods (there
>> were still a significant number that it didn't analyze due to complexity limits)
>> I'll run it again and post the full results. In my basic look over the results,
>> there were a decent number of them that may actually be bugs. (buffer overruns,
>> and even a few instances of accessing memory after it had been freed)
>
> Yes, please post.
... to bugzilla.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list