Why isn't the array lenght property an lvalue?
Jeroen Bollen
jbinero at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 13:14:13 PDT 2014
On Monday, 7 April 2014 at 20:12:48 UTC, Justin Whear wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 19:13:30 +0000, Jeroen Bollen wrote:
>
>> When I have myarray.length, why isn't that considered an
>> lvalue,
>> and as a result, why cannot I get a pointer to it?
>>
>> It seems kinda dumb, I understand it cannot be changed
>> manually,
>> but surely you should be able to get a const(type)* from it?
>
> I believe `length` is implemented as a property function,
> though I can't
> find the source for the life of me.
Then you still should be able to get a pointer of the result. I
was also considering it to be a @property function, as indeed
that'd explain this behaviour, but it still doesn't make sense to
not allow it. After all, length is just a variable.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list