A serious security bug... caused by no bounds checking.

Tommi tommitissari at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 10 21:01:17 PDT 2014


On Friday, 11 April 2014 at 00:52:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> If @safe is just a convention, then I don't see the point of 
> having it at all. If it can't be a guarantee, then it's pretty 
> much another tech buzzword with no teeth.

In order to have @safe be a guarantee of memory-safety, we need 
to prevent @safe code from calling any @trusted code.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list