A serious security bug... caused by no bounds checking.
Tommi
tommitissari at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 10 21:01:17 PDT 2014
On Friday, 11 April 2014 at 00:52:25 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> If @safe is just a convention, then I don't see the point of
> having it at all. If it can't be a guarantee, then it's pretty
> much another tech buzzword with no teeth.
In order to have @safe be a guarantee of memory-safety, we need
to prevent @safe code from calling any @trusted code.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list