Explicit default constructor for structs

[Daniel Murphy]

"monarch_dodra"  wrote in message 
news:ktbdlcaqahsqmwkiddvc at forum.dlang.org...

> Why? The D version would just go from "object.Error Access Violation" to 
> "AssertError null this".
>
> And in release, you'd still (highly probably) still get the Access 
> Violation.

Sadly I've encountered C++ code that deliberately calls member functions on 
null class pointers.