Formal review of std.lexer
Brian Schott
briancschott at gmail.com
Mon Apr 14 14:19:01 PDT 2014
On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 22:13:16 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 02/22/2014 09:31 PM, "Marc Schütz" <schuetzm at gmx.net>" wrote:
>> But that still doesn't explain why a custom hash table
>> implementation is
>> necessary. Maybe a lightweight wrapper around built-in AAs is
>> sufficient?
>
> I'm also wondering what benefit this hash table provides.
The hash table was added by Dmitry a while back. I assume it's
because he had numbers to back it up.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list