Heartbleed and static analysis

[ed]

On Sunday, 13 April 2014 at 18:45:21 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> Am 13.04.2014 20:40, schrieb Walter Bright:
>> On 4/13/2014 10:38 AM, Dicebot wrote:
>>> I think most important thing about built-in unittests is how 
>>> this feature
>>> encourages to add tests when contributing to projects that 
>>> don't
>>> currently have
>>> any real coverage. It becomes so easy that there is not 
>>> reason to not
>>> do it and
>>> this help open-source a lot.
>>
>> Exactly. You can do unittests with other languages, too, but 
>> having it
>> be so convenient, and no arguments about which unittest tool, 
>> is a game
>> changer. The built-in -cov is also a game changer.
>
> Until one gets lousy management in the picture. :(
>
> Sorry, just got a lousy week with developers deleting unit 
> tests to "improve" their builds.
>
> --
> Paulo

Wow, that would almost be a sacking offence where I work.