DIP60: @nogc attribute
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Apr 15 13:40:09 PDT 2014
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014 15:20:41 -0400, Walter Bright
<newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Let's be clear about the motivation for @nogc - there are a lot of
> people who will not use D because of fear of GC. They want a guarantee
> that the GC isn't being called. They don't want code that hides calls to
> GC.
The DIP should be clear on this. Right now it says "guarantee code will
not allocate using GC"
I now understand the rationale, and intended result. All that is left to
specify is the implementation (who does what).
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list