DIP60: @nogc attribute
    Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d 
    digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
       
    Wed Apr 16 16:20:07 PDT 2014
    
    
  
On 4/16/2014 3:42 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
> ARC may in fact be the most advantageous for a specific use case, but that in no
> way means that all use cases will see a performance improvement, and in all
> likelihood, may see a decrease in performance.
Right on. Pervasive ARC is very costly, meaning that one will have to define 
alongside it all kinds of schemes to mitigate those costs, all of which are 
expensive for the programmer to get right.
    
    
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list