DIP60: @nogc attribute

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 17 April 2014 at 10:38:54 UTC, Artur Skawina via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Yes, the current attribute situation in D is a mess.

A more coherent D syntax would make the language more 
approachable. I find the current syntax to be somewhat annoying.

I'd also like to see coherent naming conventions for attributes 
etc, e.g.

@nogc    // assert/prove no gc (for compiled code)
@is_nogc // assume/guarantee no gc (for linked code, or 
"unprovable" code)