Redesign of dlang.org
Aleksandar Ruzicic via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Apr 19 14:42:53 PDT 2014
On Saturday, 19 April 2014 at 21:34:31 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> On 4/18/2014 12:40 PM, Aleksandar Ruzicic wrote:
> >
> > I must respectfully disagree about retaining left
> justification.
> > I have 27'' monitor with resolution of 2560x1440 and
> left-aligned
> > websites are really hard to read!
> >
>
> Why does everyone these days seem to forget that windows are
> resizable?
>
> FWIW though, I find *everything* freaking unreadable and
> barely-usable on a 16:9 - good for media, worthless for
> computing.
>
> > There is a reason why most editors have "zen mode" which
> centers your
> > code on a screen. It's easier to read when it's centered and
> not too wide.
> >
> > Current design has no limitation on line width which (at my
> resolution)
> > results in ~300 characters wide lines, and it's really
> unreadable.
> >
> > I would go for a maximum of 120 characters wide lines with
> content
> > centered on larger monitors.
>
>
> Text justification has nothing to do with maximum line width.
> "max-width" works perfectly fine with left-justified, too.
>
> And left-justified makes it easier to distinguish individual
> lines, otherwise it's easier to loose your place when reading
> from one line down to the next line. Plus it does suffer from
> those inconsistently-sized spaces.
As I've said in one of previous messages, text will be
left-aligned, there is no way I would make it centered. I was
talking about layout alignment.
I was talking about max-width as a means to keep text readable,
as 300 characters per line is really too hard to read.
It seems I'll have to implement this design proposal in HTML/CSS
to be able to better communicate design decisions.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list