What's the status of old-style operator overloads in D2?
Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Apr 22 11:17:43 PDT 2014
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:15:21 -0400, Daniel Murphy
<yebbliesnospam at gmail.com> wrote:
> "Steven Schveighoffer" wrote in message
> news:op.xeqcf3vbeav7ka at stevens-macbook-pro-2.local...
>
>> If the old behavior can be exactly mimiced, I think we can get rid of
>> the old behavior.
>
> Can != Should
Sorry I misspoke. We *should* :)
>> Less code in the compiler, less complexity in the language.
>
> More complexity in user code.
A mixin statement is not complexity.
-Steve
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list