Redesign of dlang.org

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 21:21:13 UTC, Aleksandar Ruzicic 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 12:27:23 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 06:53:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
>> wrote:
>>> On 21/04/14 23:33, Dicebot wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think it is very important to dogfood here and add any 
>>>> currently
>>>> missing dependencies as dub packages instead.
>>>
>>> Unless we can use libsass, I would say it's not very 
>>> productive to implement a new Sass compiler, just to avoid a 
>>> dependency.
>>
>> I think using libsass is superior to using node/npm based 
>> dependency. Using pretty much anything from node.js 
>> infrastructure will be a big marketing hit for vibe.d (being 
>> its direct competitor in D world).
>
> I see what you mean. I get that it wouldn't be good marketing 
> so I decided not to use npm.
>
> Although I would really like if we could do dub install -g 
> <package> to distribute tools, like you can with npm..

You can do `dub fetch package; dub run package` AFAIR for 
packages that are applications. Though it does not make any sense 
to add something that is not a D  project to dub, such a popular 
thing as sass compiler must have own package, whatever distro 
dlang web server runs on.