Discusssion on the Discussion of the Design for a new GC

[Messenger via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 23 April 2014 at 15:33:36 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
> After all of that, I intend to include a base draft of the 
> design of the GC, along with opening the PRs and committing the 
> starting API. So, is there something I’m missing? Am I 
> overlooking the obvious? Is there a more practical way to 
> produce the same results?

What is the state of Rainer Schütze's precise gc? Duplication of 
effort and all that.