Discusssion on the Discussion of the Design for a new GC

[Messenger via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 17:33:08 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> Another issue is that in 64-bit address space precise GC gives 
> no advantage as false pointers have low probability, so precise 
> GC seems to be not worth the effort.

Except a precise gc is type-aware, no? And you could basically 
ask it to "please print out everything that you have currently 
allocated so I can debug what's allocating".