DIP61: Add namespaces to D

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 04/26/2014 10:32 PM, Daniel N wrote:
>>
>> The disadvantage of this is that it forces one .di file per namespace,
>> whereas in C++ people frequently use different namespaces within the
>> same file.
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>
> I would argue that this restriction is a benefit not a disadvantage,

Why on earth would precluding an organisation of the binding in the file 
system mirroring the C++ side be a benefit?