Explicit default constructor for structs

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 9 April 2014 at 14:59:35 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> E.g. it could look like this (alternative a new keyword 
> "explicit" could be introduced, but introduction of new 
> keywords is usually avoided if possible, AFAIK):
sorry for not reading the whole post and necroposting, but 
please, please, please vote for new keywords! please, stop 
suggesting obscure features that cannot be logicaly deducted! 
'@explicit' attribute can work fine here, and 'this(void)' is 
impossible to understand without carefull *studying* the 
documentation. and it is really easy to miss when reading the 
code.