More radical ideas about gc and reference counting

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 30 April 2014 at 22:24:29 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
> However, then, whether to do const(S!T) => S!(const(T)) or 
> const(S!T) => S!(TailConst!T) should maybe be specified on a 
> per-parameter basis, because this is in general not easy to 
> figure out for the compiler.

That is the whole problem :D