Voting: std.logger

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 16:43:32 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 8/1/14, 9:36 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> Oh I hadn't realized that. Thanks! That strengthens my opinion 
>> that more
>> work is needed on the library before inclusion in 
>> std.experimental.
>
> To clarify: I'm very strongly opposed to a design that requires 
> rebuilding Phobos (or relying on different pre-built versions) 
> for different logging levels. That's just unacceptable. User 
> code must be able to set logging levels by just passing flags 
> to their own builds.

Must be able, but should it be the only possible way?