Setting array length to 0 discards reserved allocation?

Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Aug 11 02:03:56 PDT 2014


On Monday, 11 August 2014 at 07:04:42 UTC, Andrew Godfrey wrote:
> Reminder: The PR is ready for review:
>
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/623
>
> Jonathan has summarized his position in the commments.
> What do the rest of you think?
> H. S. Teoh, Jakob, Ali, Marc, Dominikus, Chris -
> your impression of whether this clears up the confusion would
> help round out the feedback.

Very good.
Most of the documentation becomes imediately much more intuitive 
and instructive.
Beside some typos (at one place I saw an uppercase C where a 
valiable "c" was menat, in another place a variable c is refered 
but only b was declared), I'm very much in favor of those changes.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list