unittesting generic functions

bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Aug 14 13:38:31 PDT 2014


Idan Arye:

> Nested functions are not really "units" - they are 
> implementation details.

It's not important how you call them. I'd still like some nice 
way to test those "details" :-)

----------------

H. S. Teoh:

> When should such unittests be run, and how should the following 
> code behave?

Is just after the post-condition of the enclosing function a good 
moment to run them?

Bye,
bearophile


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list