Before we implement SDL package format for DUB

[ketmar via Digitalmars-d]

On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:20:55 +0200
Sönke Ludwig via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> I agree. Those would be the points with most impacts. However, the 
> outcome would be quite far away from standard JSON, so we would
> really be talking about something like ASON or SDL already.
most widely-used json parsers supports that three features anyway, i
believe, so it's almost safe to just add 'em.

yes, we can have other backends -- xml, ason, sdl, anything. but i
can't see any sane reasons to add such backends. they will lead to code
bloating, more testing and will just confuse end-users ("oh, which
backend i should use? why there are so many?").
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20140826/02e34ada/attachment.sig>