Before we implement SDL package format for DUB

[Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d]

On 8/26/2014 1:43 PM, eles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 13:55:13 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> Am 26.08.2014 15:37, schrieb eles:
>>> On Monday, 25 August 2014 at 19:35:09 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>>> On Monday, 25 August 2014 at 18:31:42 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
>>>
>
>> additional alternative format
>
> SDL or D
>

D's an interesting option but it utterly fails the KISS test. All it 
would do is provide many tempting and creative ways to accidentally 
obfuscate the package description file. And then there's meta-mess of 
needing the right compiler version to properly handle a given package. 
Blech.