Crazy code by Adam on SO

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 17:17:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> There's another bug I didn't notice when writing the SO answer: 
> the "module b.d;" didn't actually get picked up. Renaming it to 
> "module b;" works, but not when it includes the package.
>
> ooooh cuz it is considered "package mod" in stringof.... which 
> has no members. Maybe if the compiler just called it "module 
> foo.bar" instead of "package foo" we'd be in business though.

Yes this is a known and unfortunate limitation with this 
technique :(