Phobos - breaking existing code

Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Dec 1 03:51:48 PST 2014


On Monday, December 01, 2014 11:21:23 bearophile via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Jonathan M Davis:
>
> > but it's still better than leaving something as deprecated
> > permanently.
>
> Right, sorry, I meant disabled.
> But I don't like to keep those things disabled permanently, they
> eventually should be removed.

I agree. I do think that we should strive for stability and backwards
compatibility, but if we're getting rid of something, then I think that we
should actually get rid of it at some point. That's part of why we have the
deprecation process that we have.

- Jonathan M Davis



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list