DIP69 - Implement scope for escape proof references

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 01:52:09PM -0800, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 01:10:31PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > On 12/4/2014 11:41 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > >Can we pretty please use the term "type qualifier" instead of "type
> > >constructor"? ;-)
> > 
> > I think "type constructor" is the more pedantically correct term,
> > but you'll have to ask Andrei :-)
> 
> Recently there was a bug filed by Andrei himself, and a bunch of
> merged PRs, that renamed "type constructor" to "type qualifier". The
> general sense I got was that we're deprecating "type constructor" in
> preference for "type qualifier".
[...]

FYI: https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13671


T

-- 
"A man's wife has more power over him than the state has." -- Ralph Emerson