struct default constructor, unions and bizaro behavior.

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 12 December 2014 at 16:23:48 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
>> Anyway, I think this is reasonable to have one element for the
>> union in the tupleof as well.
>
> Which one then? :)
>

One, having an union type.