DIP69 - Implement scope for escape proof references

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 12/11/2014 10:10 PM, Dicebot wrote:
> So far I tend to agree, unfortunately. Considering all provided answers and
> explanations suggested semantics are simply not powerful enough to be useful
> even for relatively simple idiomatic D code and with no clear way of backward
> compatible improvements this DIP does not pull own weight.
> "Those are not scopes you are looking for"

The proposal provides escape proof passing of arguments. This is necessary in 
order to make rc safe, for example.

What are you looking for?