Lost a new commercial user this week :(

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2014-12-26 01:48, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:

> In this case, my colleague felt it was hard to understand the string
> functions, but he got through it (after sending me txt messages to ask
> questions).
> I recall making the same comments when I first started trying to do
> string manipulation in D. My personal take is, string functions are
> all templates, which makes them look more complex than they are, and
> for me, it was really hard to understand where to look for certain
> functions; they're spread fairly evenly across 5 or so different
> modules. Algorithm, range, ascii, uni, utf. Some of the most important
> functions are in range and algorithm. Perhaps those that are fairly
> string specific from range/algorithm should have aliases in
> std.string, or std.string might public import some of the minor
> modules, like ascii/uni/utf?

Don't forget about std.array as well ;)

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg