DIP66 has been approved contingent to a few amendments as noted

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 14:27:38 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 13:54:24 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 13:16:32 UTC, eles wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 12:59:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 15:49:46 UTC, Andrei 
>>>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> What would be the point of it? D1 is almost absolutely 
>> inferior to D2 (both compiler and language) and lacks any 
>> better tools recently created by the community.
>
> I do not contest that. But will be a less-deceiving entry-point 
> for those that are new to the language, they will bite and 
> would wish to see more...

It sounds like you have overly positive memories of D1. Working 
with it daily and especially dealing with all the compiler bugs 
we had back then (and still have with dmd1) - it is hardly an 
experience I'd want newcomer to have. Lacking quality of the 
toolchain kills any benefit from the language simplicity.