DIP66 has been approved contingent to a few amendments as noted

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 28 December 2014 at 05:55:02 UTC, ketmar via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> start a site. call for arms. close a site if there will be not 
> enough
> tension. writing "yes, resurrect D1!" here will do nothing for 
> the
> project: people just have no place to go if they are interested.

Step 1: figure out what people are unhappy about with D2
Step 2: figure out if there is a reduced feature set that people 
will be happy with
Step 3: figure out how much work it is to refactor D2
Step 4: figure out how many will be interested in contributing
etc...

Wasting time on solo projects that die is not very efficient. 
Spending time on figuring things out is potentially rewarding 
even if one decides to move in a different direction.

> but i see that the idea is already deadborn.

First you need to assess the current state of the D2 compiler to 
see if it is worth the trouble.