http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 29 December 2014 at 19:00:06 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> I tend to agree. You seem to have shown that reusing inout for 
> scope information becomes confusing. -- Andrei

What is the problem with using inout exactly as it is now (== 
both for argument and return type) but defining it to propagate 
aliasing information as it is decribed in DIP25?