Worst Phobos documentation evar!

[jklp via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 29 December 2014 at 19:49:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 12/29/2014 10:34 AM, jklp wrote:
>> I like your sense of the compromise. DDoc is mostly usefull to 
>> generate the doc
>> as html but inside the sources, it's often **unreadable**. I 
>> think that you know
>> that documentation comments as markdow would be good but maybe 
>> you're scared
>> because of the consequences implied when rendering dlang.org 
>> std reference and
>> such things.
>> And if both could live together ?
>>
>> If I had the power to do this, DDoc would be primilarly 
>> 'markdown' with
>> optionally html and macros things allowed.
>
> I don't care much for hybrids, they are confusing and ugly.

):