Worst Phobos documentation evar!

[H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d]

On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 01:26:50PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 12/31/2014 1:19 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:57:36PM -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >>On 12/31/2014 7:36 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >>>On 31/12/14 16:00, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >>>>This is a known issue:
> >>>>
> >>>>    https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13270
> >>>
> >>>Good to know.  Any preferences for proceeding with this?  Put in
> >>>place the params even allowing for the bug, or just avoid the
> >>>problem params for now?
> >>>
> >>
> >>Just ignore the warning.
> >
> >Which causes non-existent parameters to slip through (e.g., if you
> >mistyped a parameter name).
> 
> You can, of course, occasionally look at the warnings :-)

Of course. But it would be nice if this wasn't necessary in the first
place. :-)

Yes, yes, I know, where's the PR... I'll get to it! This week just isn't
a good time for that, too many things going on IRL. I'm planning to
submit some ddoc-related PRs in the near future; it would be a good time
to fold this one in too.


T

-- 
Famous last words: I *think* this will work...